The debate rages on! Do you prefer the funny, one-liner spouting Freddy of Elm Street 4,5 and 6, or the more serious, "scary" Krueger of parts 1 and 2 (with Dream Warriors being the transitional point)? Stuart Heritage of the Guardian UK seems to be less than happy with Jackie Earle Haley's more "serious approach" to the character.

"Ask yourself this: now that you know the new Nightmare On Elm Street will be light on hi-jinks, are you still excited about going to see it? Of course you're not."

"It means that, in the new Nightmare On Elm Street, you probably won't see Freddy Krueger dress up as a French waiter and feed somebody to death. It means that Freddy won't murder anyone inside a comically dated videogame. It means that – and I can hardly bring myself to say this – Freddy won't perform any more novelty raps with the Fat Boys. Performing novelty raps with the Fat Boys was Freddy Krueger's raison d'etre. It was the thing he loved most of all."

You can read the rest of Heritage's article here, then let us know who you prefer; Freddy masquerading as the Wicked Witch of the West or the child killer, bastard son of one hundred maniacs!

P.S. My favorite comment on the article is from "arctral:"

Brainstorming sessions:

What shall we do with the new Battlestar Galactica?
Well, I'm thinking dark. And edgy...

What shall we do with the new Bond?
Well, I'm thinking dark. And edgy...

What shall we do with the new Batman?
Well, I'm thinking dark. And edgy...

What shall we do with the new Bond?
Well, I'm thinking dark. And edgy...

What shall we do with the new Stargate series?
Well, I'm thinking dark. And edgy...

What shall we do with the new Elm Street film?
Well, I'm thinking dark. And edgy...

What shall we do with the new Star Trek film?
Well, I'm thinking light. (!) And edgy...